Praestegaard Group

Praestegaard Group AB · Maritime expertise worldwide.

Know what can fail before it matters

Independent maritime cyber-risk assessment for shipowners, operators, shipyards and maritime technology suppliers. Identify critical dependencies, unsupported assumptions and evidence gaps before design approval, procurement or operational change.

A confidential, no-obligation first conversation. You do not need a finished scope.

Independent assessmentPeer-reviewed researchIT · OT · Human · OrganisationLoA 1–4

Service coverage

Levels of Autonomy 1 to 4

Autonomy is not a simple transition from crewed to uncrewed operation. Each level creates different relationships between the vessel, crew, shore organisation, systems, suppliers and decision authority.

  1. LoA1
  2. LoA2
  3. LoA3
  4. LoA4

When to contact us

When change requires a more defensible decision

01

You are introducing a connected or automated vessel function

02

You are reviewing a newbuild, retrofit or design change

03

A supplier claim requires independent challenge

04

Responsibilities are moving between vessel and shore

05

You need to prepare for connectivity loss or automation failure

06

Management needs a defensible basis for a decision

Discuss your situation

01, The shift

Cyber risk changes as autonomy changes

A manned vessel can already depend heavily on connected, automated and remotely supported systems. As autonomous functions increase, responsibilities, control, system dependencies and failure consequences change. We identify these changes before they become operational weaknesses.

02, The assessment

An assessment built for the decision in front of you

We examine the vessel, system, project or scenario as a whole: IT and OT dependencies, automated functions, human oversight, operational consequences, governance, supplier responsibilities and the evidence needed to support a defensible decision.

  1. 01A prioritised register of credible cyber and operational risks
  2. 02Clear immediate actions and longer-term mitigations
  3. 03Missing assumptions, controls and fallback arrangements exposed
  4. 04Questions and evidence requirements for suppliers and stakeholders
  5. 05An expert-reviewed management brief and practical roadmap

03, Method

From decision to action plan

01

Define the decision and operational context

02

Review systems, people, dependencies and evidence

03

Prioritise risks and challenge assumptions

04

Deliver actions, mitigations and verification needs

Tangible deliverables

What you receive

04, Evidence

Research informed. Expert reviewed.

Our work is grounded in peer-reviewed maritime cybersecurity research and structured sociotechnical analysis. Every client deliverable is professionally reviewed and must be evaluated against the applicable operational context, regulation, classification requirements and engineering constraints.

DOI 10.12716/1001.20.01.25

05, Engage

Three ways to work with us

01

Cyber-risk assessment across LoA 1 to 4

A focused assessment of a vessel, system, project or operational scenario at the applicable Level of Autonomy.

02

Autonomy transition and design assurance

Independent challenge of new designs, retrofit plans, automated functions, operational concepts and supporting evidence.

03

Operational preparedness and governance

Structured scenarios and exercises for cyber incidents, system failures, connectivity loss and changes in operational control.

Specialist service

MASS Code readiness

For vessels and projects within the relevant scope, we assess readiness for the non-mandatory IMO MASS Code and its future development. This is a specialist application within our broader work across Levels of Autonomy 1 to 4.

Explore MASS Code readiness

06, Leadership

Björn Praestegaard Larsen

Björn Praestegaard Larsen leads each engagement, combining expert judgement, peer-reviewed research and proprietary analytical methods developed for maritime cyber risk across different Levels of Autonomy.

Read more

07, Next step

Start with one bounded decision or scenario

Describe the decision, system or operational change you need to assess. We will propose a focused engagement with defined deliverables.

Discuss an assessment